Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuebecAir Flight 321

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of aircraft hijackings. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

QuebecAir Flight 321[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable hijacking. These were common aviation events in the 60s and 70s. ...William 14:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions....William 14:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William 14:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 14:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.14:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Could consider merge to List of aircraft hijackings, but don't delete. Plenty of coverage of this event can be found by a simple Google search, and even in 2008 a newspaper headline could still refer to the perpetrator as an "infamous hijacker".[1] --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

merge to List of aircraft hijackings or delete. It's not that infamous: the only documentation I could find was (a) news reports of the hijacking, (b) news reports that the hijacker was being let out, and (c) a relentlessly comprehensive book listing any air incident which could even remotely be considered "terrorism". If we have to list every hijacking, then this would go in the list; otherwise the notability isn't there. Mangoe (talk) 17:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.