Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi-Hopf algebra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. The author only edits was to take two articles (this one and Quasi-bialgebra) to AfD with no proper reasoning. The article is clearly going to be kept. Probably related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spherical model and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney J. Baxter. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quasi-Hopf algebra[edit]

Non notable concept.Mathguru 06:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep (author bias) It's mentioned in many books and papers.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. scholar.google.com reports this as being a notable (albeit esoteric) branch of mathematics. -- GWO

Commment. Mathguru is a new user, and these nominations are his/her first edits. Speedy keep?-- GWO

Keep obviously. While I trust this nomination was in good faith, I would like to know why this is considered not notable. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 07:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. --Lambiam ^Talk 07:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- although it needs an overhaul. Horribly technical. I'm no dunce when it comes to maths, but I'm struggling to understand this. Reyk _YO! 08:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is just the kind of thing people will come to wikipedia to look up Ydam 10:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepHopf algebras are an important area of research. Wikipedia can and should have research level topics (compliant with NOR, of course). This may be irreparably technical; that is OK. -lethe ^{talk +} 10:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.