Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasardb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:31, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quasardb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article. Fails WP:ORGIND scope_creep (talk) 23:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Want to help improve this article. Please tell me how to? How can I make it less promotional? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt44Ro (talk • contribs) 01:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC) — Matt44Ro (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Have the company become ACTUALLY notable and provide independent sources attesting to that? --Calton | Talk 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence in the article that this company is notable. --Calton | Talk 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - obvious spam Shritwod (talk) 18:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.