Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quantec[edit]

This company appears to fail WP:CORP because it has not got substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Reyk _YO! 21:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - I am always willing to err on the side of delete for WP:CORP, but this one meets the criteria. It was non-trivial to find notability info and third-party media coverage. Try German, and try European press. WP:BIAS and all that. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per overwhelmingly convincing argument. Separete COI issue should be handled.--Cerejota (talk) 10:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —Shortserve (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cerejota, what do you mean that it was "non-trivial" to find coverage? If you found some, where is it?
The products of this company seem to have gotten reviews in reliable sources, per the translations at the company's press site. Most of these have appeared in the German audio magazine Keys. One is available at Pro Audio Review, and then there's one at Mix Professional Audio and Music Production.
Nevertheless, I don't see that we have significant coverage of the company, or that the bits in those articles are enough to verify the facts from the article. It was also created by an SPA who might be affiliated with Quantec's founder Wolfgang Buchleitner, even though he denied wanting to promote the company when both the article on company and founder were deleted on the German Wikipedia following the discussion at de:WP:Löschkandidaten/9. Dezember 2007#Wolfgang Buchleitner (gelöscht).
All in all I say delete, fails WP:CORP and WP:V. --Amalthea 15:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my first impression at looking at the article was - why was this not speedied as A7. Then I saw a previous G11 nomination which was averted by a rewrite. Agathoclea (talk) 19:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the research done by Amalthea above, showing this is not a notable company. Terraxos (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.