Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quanergy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quanergy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Article is more or less an advert. Also the company has gone bankrupt. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 08:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 08:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Majority of sources are company’s own press releases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the article has issues, but there is some coverage (Axios is the best single source I could find). I have removed a bunch of the promotional and unsourced content; no vote on whether the rump article should be deleted or not. Walt Yoder (talk) 18:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources in the article are self-published, even Yahoo News (reprint of a press release) and FastCompany (it's a company profile, for Bloomberg there's consensus to treat those as self-published). One (non-established?) source in the article deals with the bankruptcy, and Axios, presented above, does too. If every source is about a company's failure, we shouldn't have an article. This company is also not worth mentioning at Lidar or elsewhere. DFlhb (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.