Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quack Web Internet Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as blatant advertising and as an article about a commercial business that makes no showing of particular importance: Quack Web has attributed much of its success from their low prices, overselling, and fast connection speeds. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quack Web Internet Solutions[edit]

When it comes to WP:CORP and WP:RS, Quack lays an egg. Serious observations and ducky puns are welcome here. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even duck tape wouldn't fix this article. And it doesn't assert notability. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 03:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. Send me the bill. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 05:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not a feather of notability or coverage in reliable sources, as far as I can see. I don't see a reason why this article shouldn't go down. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 09:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Oh dear. SHould have been a {db-advert}/company in my view, I would have done so if I had patrolled it ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 09:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't see any improvements that could be made to turn this ugly duckling into a swan. Pedro : Chat 12:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.