Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qfusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Quake II#Quake II engine. Stifle (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Qfusion[edit]

This video game is just another Quake knockoff. According to the article: "Qfusion is particularly notable because War§ow, a popular free standalone game is based on the engine." It's claiming its notability off of another site, which isn't allowed as notability isn't inherited. That and the lack of independent sources have led me to believe that this game fails WP:N. Tavix (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Nasica (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Quake II#Quake II engine if WP:V can be satisfied (which currently isn't.) Does not appear to have received enough significant coverage from reliable sources. Marasmusine (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - There are four news articles that mention the engine. Some academic works[1][2][3][4] by mostly the same authors describe how the engine was used in their research. SharkD (talk) 04:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.