Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qamar Zaman (QZEE)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Qamar Zaman (QZEE)[edit]

Qamar Zaman (QZEE) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable business owner. Sources are all in passing quotes of him saying why people should still make press releases. No articles about subject. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Simply because those discussions mentioned in my option demonstrate he's an important part of the press release industry Santafesoul (talk) 03:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Also KEPP" because the Business 2 Community article is clearly about his low cost ($10 instead of $500) approach to the business and why his company has grown to 100M.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (quip) @ 20:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indication of meeting WP:BASIC, reads like an autobio, even the keep argument sounds like an advert. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.