Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QWERTY (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QWERTY (song)[edit]

Article on a demo version of a song that might not even be commercially released. Until it's released as a single it doesn't deserve its own article. Wikipedia isn't an LP fansite. GrahameS 04:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for the reasons mentioned above. --SayCheese 04:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Qwerty is the working title for an unreleased song" - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --IslaySolomon 09:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete crystal-ballery Mgm|^(talk) 11:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Come on where is everyones sense of humour - great title for a song! Delete though of course Nigel ^(Talk) 12:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Have a nice day. --Dennisthe2 19:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's just a waste of space. Hello2112 22:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn notable .--Shella * 22:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although I don't see it as quite as obvious as the above commentors, as the song has apparantly generated some buzz due to its internet "release". Still not enough, though. Herostratus 06:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you guys serious? Mike Shinoda really seemed to insinuate that this was a song from their next album. Clearly, the whole crystal ball argument has absolutely nothing to do with this. Additionally, a band as famous as Linkin Park surely makes this notable. This definitely ought to stay.
Delete per nom. --Zimbabweed 22:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While it is a good song, it is still a live demo of a song that may not make it on LP's new album. It does not merit its own article. Some of this information could be placed in the main Linkin Park page, however. Falcon37 25 September 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.