Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QIK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bongwarrior (talk) 01:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

QIK[edit]

No sources can be found which affords QIK notability inline with WP policies. Russavia (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 03:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per WP:V. One Google Books hit, few regular Google hits.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 07:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Great improvement.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 04:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added references as best I can see, it is notable and seems to be a major reservation system used by airlines - Fosnez (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this seems to be adequately sourced now. — brighterorange (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 02:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the sources cited in QIK#References are sufficient to establish a presumption of this program's notability per the general notability guideline. John254 04:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.