Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PythonTurtle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 03:28, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PythonTurtle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of 121.75.246.79, who posted a request at WT:AFD. Their rationale is posted verbatim below. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PythonTurtle doesn't seem to meet any of the notability requirements. 121.75.246.79 (talk) 13:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 15:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 15:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete I'm not seeing a lot of interest in this; mostly I find myself wading through various downloads for it. Mangoe (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability, or perhaps it's so deeply hidden that one can't easily find it. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query: Is there a difference between "pythonturtle" and "python turtle"? If there isn't, GNG seems trivial. However, demonstrating one way or the other seems oddly difficult. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be two different things meant by python turtle. The first is the LOGO-like programming environ mentioned in the article. The second is given by the turtle python/Tk module. This is a graphics module with no development environ associated with it, just an API. --Mark viking (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 23:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.