Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyaar ki Pungi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 01:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pyaar ki Pungi[edit]
- Pyaar ki Pungi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Indian song from Hindi film that claims no notability. (Just one liner plagiarism concern seems notable. But it already covered in the main film's article Agent Vinod. This fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:23, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: We do have sources available:
- Pyaar Ki Pungi is an original track
- Pritam in trouble for 'Pyaar ki Pungi
- 'Pyaar ki Pungi' inspired by 'Soosan Khanoom'?
- Full Song: Agent Vinod's peppy Pyaar Ki Pungi
Secret of success (talk) 16:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying Keep or what? Its not going to be deleted anyways. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - At the very least, this meets WP:GNG per: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:54, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.