Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putting Cumbria First

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mz7 (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Putting Cumbria First[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties. The previous AfD was no consensus, and little if anything has been improved upon. Citations prove that the party exists without any notable achievements. Fails WP:GNG and ORG. The article reads as a summary of election results and there is no notable achievement or importance. Usefulness is not a valid reason for retention. doktorb _words^deeds 10:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 10:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 10:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 10:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The previous AfD can be found here. PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 17:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The party has received direct coverage in local newspapers [1] [2] (satisfying WP:NORG), and has an elected councillor on Allerdale Borough Council. The page has been improved substantially since the first AfD (compare [3] to [4]). PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 17:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 10:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- puddleglum^2.0 00:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.