Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puthiya Swarangal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 05:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puthiya Swarangal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF ― Padenton |☎ 19:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton |☎ 19:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton |☎ 19:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton |☎ 19:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alt spelling:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tamil language:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment:... so let's see if this completed film's failure to release meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3). And if nothing else, a redirect to Vijayan (actor) is sourcable and worth a consideration... or perhaps to composer Ilaiyaraaja as his music for the film has released. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:... I believe the film have adequate reference and this one is sufficient (http://ramachandrababu.blogspot.in/2012/01/my-unreleased-tamil-films-1.html). The reference for songs are also updated...Please keep the page as it is. Rajeshbieee (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your efforts, but please read WP:RS. Blogs are usually unacceptable for sourcing. I know its been years, but perhaps you could track down some reliable sources (in any language) from which the blog information was obtained? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm seeing mostly blogs, not reliable sources in any language. If such sources are added, I'd revisit. Neutrality^talk 23:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.