Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Push Pop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Topps. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Push Pop[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not indicate notability, unsourced, the ad phrases are purely promotional. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Topps as per WP:PRODUCT, which states Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy. -Addionne (talk) 23:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Initial thought was how this was even nominated, till I looked at the article. While I technically voted merge, 95% of the existing info needs to go. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.