Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pupi Poisson

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pupi Poisson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Pupi Poisson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poisson fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant coverage about her. The Screen Rant source is three lines long. Being on several reality shows doesn't make her notable either. Dougal18 (talk) 15:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC) "Withdrawn by nominator" With 5 keeps there's no point keeping this open for another 6 days. BTW can the last edit be revdelled? I don't want my IP visible.--Dougal18 (talk) 16:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    • Comment I took care of the rev-del. I'm arguably involved as I !voted below, but this seemed a no brainer Star Mississippi 17:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you.--Dougal18 (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's an in-depth biographical article in El Espanol here; another biographical article on 20 Minutos here; and Ecoteuve here. Those are just the sources that focus solely on the subject, but there's more out there in relation to her appearance on RPDR reviews. All available sourcing should be reviewed when nominating an article for deletion, not just the sources on the page. This article should be expanded, not deleted. --Kbabej (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Did you even try finding more sources? If so, you'd see the subject has appeared on multiple television series, released an album + multiple singles, and been featured on singles released by other artists. Plus there's Spanish-language sourcing to consider as well. We should expand the Career and Personal life sections further, not delete the entry. I'd welcome Spanish speakers to assist with finding additional coverage. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment She fails WP:ENT and WP:SINGER. But let's ignore that just because some people wrote articles on her non notable TV appearances. Dougal18 (talk) 09:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply You mean the routine coverage any competitor gets from being on the show? Dougal18 (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep, if you find others have the same in-depth profiles of their careers to date and other work, you're welcome to create articles on them too. Most of these sources are far beyond routine Star Mississippi 15:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn. I'll try and avoid sending articles to AfD of people who's only vague claim to notability is being a Drag Race contestant. I will take into consideration media appearances that would result a "delete" should the article have been created prior to being in Drag Race. I will take into consideration that having several non notable "careers" can make someone notable because there is a few articles written about said "careers" due to their latest appearance on reality TV. Shantay stay.--Dougal18 (talk) 16:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think the sarcasm is particularly helpful or constructive. If you want to withdraw this nomination, you can follow those steps listed at WP:WDAFD. --Kbabej (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep have expanded it with some of the articles mentioned by Kbabej and another I found. I cannot access this one but do read Spanish and am happy to help if someone can access it. Star Mississippi 17:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Agree with the other users on here. I found, apart from the articles I added to this post, mentions in one in El Comercio (Spanish-language source), one page on Tidal, this, or an article in La Vanguardia, to name a few. Clearly, the OP did not even try and find additional sources for Pupi, but went to the extreme option of nominating the page for deletion without a second thought. It is unfortunate to see. Historyday01 (talk) 17:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pupi_Poisson&oldid=1035578059"