Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punkscene (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Punkscene[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established for 5 years. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any coverage in reliable sources. It hasn't promoted any famous bands (even the 2 blue-linked ones in that list are of questionable notability). No evidence of why it's significant. If somebody can find press/media coverage of the project, it might be saved, but without it, the project isn't notable. (Previous AfD is so far from current standards, it's comical.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not finding any coverage in reliable sources, either; subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Gong show 22:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the long list of redlinks speaks loudly: clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.