Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puncher & Wattmann
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to David Musgrave. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Puncher & Wattmann[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Puncher & Wattmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No apparent notability. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 04:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 04:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Kolma8 (talk) 08:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to David Musgrave, an obvious alternative to deletion which must be considered before the page is deleted outright. Deus et lex (talk) 08:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- I of course have no objection to a redirect. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect. Both make sense given the state of the article and options. gidonb (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to David Musgrave: Non notable publishing house, fails NCORP.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 13:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to David Musgrave, redirects are cheap. Not enough in-depth coverage to show independent notability. Onel5969 TT me 17:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.