Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puente Viejo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Puente Viejo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find any reliable references that can back up any of the information found in this article.

Additionally the tag dates back to December 2009 so this article could have contained incorrect information since then and this further emphasises that no reliable references have been found to back up the information contained here. Nathanielcwm (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Nathanielcwm (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Early 17th-century bridge with references on the Spanish Wikipedia article. Plenty of other sourcing can be found by a Google search. Appears to be pretty notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Spanish Language page implies it has notability. The google book search found several hits, while they are not languages that I speak what I could get from them seem the subject is notable. Jeepday (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - enough sourcing out there to pass WP:GNG and certainly passes WP:GEOFEAT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.