Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pubsumer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pubsumer[edit]

Propose deletion on grounds of WP:Neologism, WP:Dictdef and WP:Notability (only 3 ghits). Prod removed by contributor without comment. Marasmusine (talk) 17:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ASAP. Deb (talk) 17:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TIND Dusti^SPEAK!! 19:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DCEdwards ¹⁹⁶⁶ 17:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yamakiri ^T_C § 07-1-2008 • 17:26:56 17:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Numyht (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Rasadam (talk) 18:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the nominator's right on. When there are 4 ghits, one's wikipedia, and one's unrelated, and it's claiming to be a neologism, it's time to delete. Vickser (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.