Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pub Jyotinagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Noonmati. The keep !votes(one of which resulted from the article creator) failed to put forward any suitable argument/sources for inclusion. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 02:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pub Jyotinagar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable residential area of a suburb of a city. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:GEOFEAT. —usernamekiran(talk) 02:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know what evidence Wikipedia needs for inclusion of this locality. Also what process is involved after which it is confirmed this locality is to be excluded?- Nikish Das — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikish21 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep most populated places should have an article on Wikipedia. Indian place referencing is handicapped as much is not online or not in English. As long as the content is based on others writings, even if it is a signboard displayed in public, then it is free of original research. The area appears big enough to warrant an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

City —> Suburb —> residential area.

Talking about India, almost every set of 20 houses has a name in India. Usually ending with "Nagar" among Colony, Mahallah, and few names. As all of these places have houses, they are populated. You will not believe my statements, and I am not asking you to. But I insist you to visit wikimapia, and search for "Parbhani" (it is a city) then zoom in anywhere that you want. You will see that my statements are correct. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GEOLAND, a clearly defined populated place. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 13:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ unfortunately, as this is not a well defined area, but rather a residential colony around a small road. Perhaps other editors may not be familiar, but in India, what we call a "colony" is usually a locality or neighbourhood. This is a small locality of Guwahati. The spelling is also incorrect and I cannot find sources for any of the information. The content seems to be largely written based on personal knowledge. However, I will ask the creator of the article to find some sources and see if it can be added to another suitable article.--DreamLinker (talk) 07:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with what Graeme Bartlett has said. I personally stay in this neighbourhood and I can confirm I know much more details about this place. I don't consider that this is a small area of 20 houses as on an estimate 300 or above houses is there is this neighbourhood. We have our own developement comittee assigned for this place developement since it is large enough. We have 13 byelanes one well developed Business area(Chowk). We do have a Hindu temple named after this place. Since I have created this article It is completely based on my personal observations and reality, I am new to Wikipedia any guidance will be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikish21 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal Usernamekiran,Kind Tennis Fan,Graeme Bartlett,AlessandroTiandelli333 I had a discussion with Nikish21 where I suggested that a merge to Noonmati could be done, so as to preserve content. [1],[2],[3]. Although Nikish21 prefers a standalone article, there are some reasons I would prefer to merge and preserve the content.
- Nikish21 has written the content based on his own experiences. He has also contributed a photo, I think it is good for Wikipedia to keep the contributions. So instead of delete, it would be good to merge
- Pub Jyotinagar is a small "colony". The road is approx 900m long on Google maps (max area 1km^2). A similar sized (slightly larger) colony such as "Dwarka Sector 10" in Delhi doesn't have its own article, but is mentioned in the main Dwarka, Delhi article. Other colonies of a similar size don't have their own articles as well.
- Pub Jyotinagar doesn't have its own post office, but is under the Noonmati post office.
- The content in this article can easily fit at Noonmati and be described under "colonies" subheading. That will preserve the information. If there is more information available about Pub Jyotinagar, it can be added there or later this article can be restored.
I feel a merge would be good here instead of a delete or keep.--DreamLinker (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn I agree with DreamLinker. If somebody has something to say, including Kind Tennis Fan, kindly make your argument before this discussion being closed. I request to the closing editor to not to close the discussion before seven days from being relisted. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be nice to decide here itself whether we go for a standalone article (keep) or for a merge. Rather than another discussion on the talk, it would be easier to discuss and decide right here.--DreamLinker (talk) 07:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Noonmati which is the larger locality of which it is a part of. My reasons are already stated above in the proposal.--DreamLinker (talk) 07:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I agree with DreamLinker. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Even though nominator for deletion, I change from default delete to merge.

@DreamLinker: Thats what I meant, to decide it in this discussion. Thats why I asked for more time ;) —usernamekiran(talk) 02:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (De-boldened dup !vote) I still firmly believe to keep this article as a standalone. Because in my City the average area of neighbourhood is this. Noonmati is a very large area do we have various neighbourhoods like Choonsali, Ganeshnagar, Pub Jyotinagar , Jayanta Nagar which are itself large enough. So as a local person over here My opinion is to keep it and not merge-Nikish21 (talk) 15:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.