Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychreg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Psychreg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable web product, not covered in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG Winner 42 Talk to me! 18:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No independent sources. --Randykitty (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does look to fail WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:GNG. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no secondary sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:CORPDEPTH 7 WP:GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 14:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.