Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychoembryology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 23:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Psychoembryology[edit]
This term gets only three Google results. Unfortunately, none of them work. From the results page, two of them appear to be mentions in a list. The word is not shown in the third result, but it is not promising. If this was a real field of study, I would expect far more results, with at least several of them being of decent quality. The article mentions cellular memories (mispelled in the article), which seems to be pseudoscience from my brief investigation. Here is one statement about them. "Cellular memories are stored in the DNA, which we receive from our ancestors. Cellular memory is created whenever we experience trauma or make an emotional decision. And if you believe in such things, cell memory comes in from other lifetimes, other aspects of ourselves in other dimensions." I believe that this article should be deleted as non-notable pseudoscience. -- Kjkolb 12:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 12:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: a pseudoscience without followers, and looks like a bad Babelfish translation of some sort. The two links are unimpressive (Yahoo free hosting?) Zetawoof(ζ) 22:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as per nom, also qualifies as Nonsense IMnsHO Pete.Hurd 19:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.