Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prothom Kadam Phool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep.(non-admin closure) Dwaipayan (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prothom Kadam Phool[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and has no reliable sources. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - decent content at present, and can be expanded if tagged appropriately. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alt year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alt spelling:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bengali:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and per WP:INDAFD: Prothom Kadam Phool & alt: Pratham Kadam Phool

Keep this brand new decent stub that is sourced and further sourcable. Seems a bit problematic to send an improvable topic to AFD within hours of its creation. We are self-admittedly imperfect and a work in progress after all. Let its author continue in good faith and revisit later. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.