Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protein-coated disc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:38, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protein-coated disc[edit]

Protein-coated disc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD with original rationale "Not notable, 10 year old hypothetical storage format which did not lead to any further research or commercial product. Article is based solely on 10 year old news reports about this potential technology." —Ruud 14:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. doesn't exist yet. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The product was never created, not to mention decade old references. Callsignpink (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- outdated WP:Crystal. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.