Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proportional approval voting (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proportional approval voting[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per this discussion. Cordyceps2009 (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted material. If this can't be speedied – Delete; non-notable voting method (lacking mention in several independent reliable sources). --Lambiam 22:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean WP:G4? As I'm not an administrator, I can't tell whether it's the same as the previously deleted material, but if it is, it can be tagged as such... Cheers, I'^mperator 00:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Judging by mirrors the article appears to be very different from the previous version and has a different source, so I removed my speedy designation. On the other hand it was recreated by a banned suspected sock puppet. NTK (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.