Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propagandaware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propagandaware[edit]

Contested prod. Unreferenced single-sentence of dubious credibility. No established notability through reliable third-party sources. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:OR, lacks WP:RS & WP:V. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. There is practically no mention of this term beyond a website of the same name. Black-Velvet 11:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliable sources and verifiability. If anything, this appears currently to be a minor protologism, although interestingly the only mention of this term that I can find in a published source is a passing mention in this article of 10 years ago, in which the author apparently invents the term in the final sentence. I've had a look but I can't find any reliable secondary sources with content that could form the basis of an encyclopedic article on this. Wiw8 (talk) 12:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At the most this would be a dictionary item, until something is said about it in a reliable source. -Northwestgnome (talk) 18:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.