Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promode R. Bandyopadhyay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Clear consensus for article retention. North America1000 21:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Promode R. Bandyopadhyay[edit]
- Promode R. Bandyopadhyay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Awards do not seem prestigious enough for WP:PROF. CapitalSasha ~ talk 18:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Awards are prestigious enough and notable.[1][2] 'The Freeman Scholar Award' is given to a person of significant expertise in fluids engineering and 'The Fluids Engineering Award' is bestowed for outstanding contributions, over a period of years, to the engineering profession and especially to the field of fluids engineering through research, practice, and/or teaching. Moreover the fact that Promode R. Bandyopadhyay is a 'Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)'(ASME#ASME_fellow) totally qualifies the criteria set in point No.3 of Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Specific criteria notes. Lastly, a person such as Promode R. Bandyopadhyay who is having 17 U.S. Patents[3] or inventions (and more than 5 pending) must have contributed significantly in the field of Engineering which again corresponds with point No.1 of Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Specific criteria notes. According to Google Scholars database, Promode R. Bandyopadhyay has a total citation of 3331, h-index of 24, i10-index of 55 (though the Measures of citability such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness according to Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#citation metrics) till date against 172 publications listed there. Quite notably, one of his papers titled 'New aspects of turbulent boundary-layer structure' has been cited by 800.[4] Suman chowdhury 22 (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://www.asme.org/about-asme/participate/honors-awards/literature-awards/freeman-scholar-award
- ^ https://www.asme.org/about-asme/get-involved/honors-awards/achievement-awards/fluids-engineering-award
- ^ https://www.google.ch/search?tbo=p&tbm=pts&hl=en&q=ininventor:%2522Promode+R.+Bandyopadhyay%2522#hl=en&tbm=pts&q=Promode+R.+Bandyopadhyay
- ^ https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=tac3UOQAAAAJ&citation_for_view=tac3UOQAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC).
- Keep. Five publications with over 100 citations each is good enough for WP:PROF#C1, and ASME Fellow is good enough for #C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - the citation counts are just enough for him to pass WP:PROF. Onel5969 TT me 19:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.