Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promo Direct

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promo Direct[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

specialized trade awards, no other reliable sources, and no reason to expect any for such a small niche company, DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As written, fails WP:NCOMPANY and seems like puffed-up spam. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing all for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no significant coverage in independent sources. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.