Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prohibition (current)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 07:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prohibition (current)[edit]
User:Drcaldev didn't answer when I asked how this was distinct from Prohibition (drugs). I'm guessing based on his recent edits that he believes it's inappropriate to talk about current laws as "drug prohibition" because alcohol and tobacco are drugs but are not prohibited. If that's the reason, there is no need for separate articles. Prohibition (drugs) never claims that all drugs have ever been prohibited and is therefore the appropriate article regardless of any questions about the title.
- Delete as a POV fork. Gazpacho 04:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as being more of Drcaldev's agenda-pushing. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 04:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definite POV pushing. -- Kicking222 04:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant and POV. --Dennisthe2 05:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV, conspiracy theory and the creator refuses to answer questions on it's validity. Ben W Bell talk 07:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as extremely POV. OBM | blah blah blah 10:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. POV soapboxing by a single topic editor trying to push his own minority views on Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp 00:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.