Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Reconstructionism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Reconstructionism[edit]

Progressive Reconstructionism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged as having no sources since 2018. Google scholar search gives no indication that the movement described exists outside of this article. Daask (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - sources just don't exist for this Balle010 (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The only reference I can find to this outside of Wikipedia is this (emphasis mine):

These forms of Reconstructionism are unconnected to Christian Reconstructionism (aka Dominion Theology), which is an attempt to establish theocratic government, and to Progressive Reconstructionism, which is a movement bringing together Reconstructionist Jews, liberal Christians, and progressive adherents to other faiths. See also CHRISTIANITY; JUDAISM.
— Chryssides, George D. (2011). Historical Dictionary of New Religious Movements. Scarecrow Press.

However, since that's the only mention in the source, I can't entirely rule out citogenesis, as the book was published in 2011, several years after the article was created, and that's the sole mention of the term in that source (so no way it meets WP:GNG). Vahurzpu (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.