Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Foundation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources suggesting any sort of Notability - refs include its own website and a couple of directory listings. Was dePRODded without comment by an IP. PamD 22:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article by a new editor on a recently-formed NGO. As the nomination said, the given references are poor, hardly sufficient to verify basic existence. The External Links include several about apparently unrelated organisations which also feature the word "progressive". My searches are not finding coverage of this particular NGO. (Note that the tailored Wikiproject India search does find several "Progressive Foundation" mentions, but these predate this particular NGO.) Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. No in-depth articles that show notability. This might qualify for WP:speedy deletion under A7. User:SW3 5DL|SW3 5DL]] (talk) 04:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hope i have added lots of information into this article, soon will upload more info, so please remove issue note — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onestar12 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.