Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Layton and the Illusory Forest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Professor Layton media. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Layton and the Illusory Forest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is now five months old. However, nearly all data present on the page can also be found at List of Professor Layton media, and adding onto the lack of information is the fact that the book doesn't really meet WP:NBOOK. I can see no real reason to keep it. Hammerbrodude (talk) 11:05, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I don't see why we need to go through and AFD here when there is already a logical place that already has the info and that could have been done much quicker than this.--76.66.188.209 (talk) 23:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:RS, WP:INDY, and WP:NBOOK. The image might or might not be worth moving to List of Professor Layton media, pending a review of the individual articles for the other items in said list (and possible selection of a limited number of images from said articles to be moved to the list article). Note that if the image is moved, its "non-free media use rationale" info will need to be updated accordingly. Richwales (talk · contribs) 02:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.