Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Thievery (webcomic)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Professional Thievery (webcomic)[edit]
Goto Wikipedia's List of webcomics and take a look. Soon, Wikipedia will have more articles on webcomics than every other subject put together. A few more heads bashing at them could help, cause the inevitable "well, there's about a thousand more non notable webcomics here, why delete this one" is going to start cropping up if otherwise. This is a random comic genesis freehost webcomic, found here. Take a look at the website, now maybe have a look at Alexa and take a look on Google, but it ain't notable. - Hahnchen 00:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 00:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 00:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
- Keep: Nominator has failed to state a reason why this article should be deleted. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 01:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Lol, pretty much everything. Alexa gives nothing, Google gives nothing. Although the nominator for Go Nintendo below puts it way more eloquently. - Hahnchen 01:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Seriously, the bulk of your argument is that we have a lot of webcomic articles. So what? We have a lot of video game articles too. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Lol, pretty much everything. Alexa gives nothing, Google gives nothing. Although the nominator for Go Nintendo below puts it way more eloquently. - Hahnchen 01:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I think the threshold of notability for web comics that would serve Wikipedia best is that the author makes money out of it (other than a few token from online advertising). Otherwise, we run the risk of having a flurry of vanity articles from anybody who draws. I nominated this related article a while back but it didn't pass. Regarding this present case, the web-site doesn't sell books, are ask for a pay subcription and therefore doesn't pass (my newly create rule). Therefore, I think it should be deleted. Tony Bruguier 02:40, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete C'mon Bruguiea, some of the best things in life, including advertising a non-notable webcomic on Wikipedia, are free. Montco 02:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia not being a billboard to advertise your webcomic. The El Reyko 07:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One relevant hit on google. Not notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 08:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- CNN did a piece on this webcomic and how it will impact the war in Iraq. Oh wait, no they didn't. Delete as non-notable. Fagstein 04:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. —-- That Guy, From That Show! (esperanza) 2006-04-21 13:38
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.