Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Product References In Lyrics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 03:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Product References In Lyrics[edit]
- Product References In Lyrics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article consists solely of a list of references to products in songs. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Kamek (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article makes no effort to discuss the cultural background behind product references in music, cites no sources besides the primary sources of the lyrics themselves, and runs afoul of WP:IINFO. --DachannienTalkContrib 08:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic article. No source, no category, no introduction. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; fails to meet the scope implied by its title. 14 references in various unrelated songs to the Roland TR-808 comes nowhere close to a list of "product references in lyrics" (which would be a practically infinite list anyway). The cultural background which Dachannien mentions might be worthy of an article, but there's no attempt to cover that here. Zetawoof(ζ) 10:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN listcruft. Alot of wrong info too ("Limp Bizkit has a song called "A.D.I.D.A.S."...sorry, but that song's by Korn) Doc Strange (talk) 20:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete, just move Well I've seen lots of lists like this on wikipedia (ex: List of famous Hungarians) and if it is mostly about the Roland TR-808 then why not just move it to that article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.30.15.190 (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- other stuff exists isn't a good reason to keep an article Doc Strange (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.