Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessOn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ProcessOn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no references and so makes no claim of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Google didn't reveal much of note. The top Google hit is for the Chrome app page. But it looked like similar apps, with >10x as many users, didn't have Wikipedia pages. So the existence of a Chrome app is not in itself notable. Also the article as it exists now is basically nonsense. Lrieber (talk) 03:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as by far nothing at all for both the applicable notability and also for any independent minimal notability. SwisterTwister talk 08:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.