Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Ulster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Ulster[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Article created by now banned sockpuppet. Nikki♥311 00:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 00:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG, has received coverage in many national and international sources: ITV [1] ESPN [2] Irish Mirror: [3] and two from the Belfast Telegraph: [4] [5]. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that's significant coverage. The first two sources have one sentence each about Pro Wrestling Ulster. The first Belfast Telegraph article is about a wrestler from Ulster, not the promotion, and doesn't mention the promotion at all. The second is about a wrestler who trained there but not about the promotion itself. The Irish Mirror article mentions the promotion quite a bit, but its apparently a tabloid so possibly not "reliable". Nikki♥311 17:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete this. For the love of god, you have been going round and trying to delete all my pages. I want justice. What's the main reason for it being took down anyway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyisrhoode (talk • contribs) 17:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nah Don't delete it, class wee page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyisrhoode (talk • contribs) 16:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- promo content that lacks sufficient notability; lacks sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable per WP:NCORP.LM2000 (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.