Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Jawalkar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of ♥ 21:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanka Jawalkar[edit]

Priyanka Jawalkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence she played a significant role in Kala Varam Aaye. Fails WP:NACTOR and a case of WP:TOOSOON. GSS💬 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS💬 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GSS💬 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS💬 17:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep She played the lead in Kala Varam Aaye and Taxiwaala and the article has enough sources to establish notability. --Ab207 (talk) 14:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207: Kala Varam Aaye is not a notable film per WP:NFILM so it does not satisfy WP:NACTOR that require significant role in multiple notable films. GSS💬 15:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GSS: Kala Varam Aaye is sourced by Times of India, reliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES; Along with Taxiwaala, she played lead role in at least two films. She also has other films in production. So subject does satisfy WP:NACTOR.-- Ab207 (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207: No it doesn't, as I said above WP:NACTOR require significant role in multiple notable films and "Kala Varam Aaye" doesn't meet WP:NFILM that require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and this profile on TOI does not establish notability. GSS💬 16:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence she has even met the multiple roles in notable films requirement, let alone she has had multiple significant roles in notable films.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 01:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.