Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Choudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanka Choudhary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single significant role, fails WP:NACTOR and sources don't meet WP:GNG criteria. Ravensfire (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fail to pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Many IANS PR links are there, which I removed in the past but the page creator undo my edits, might be COI IssueSonofstar (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Needs multiple lead roles. She got her first for now. But more needed. WP:TOOSOON like many other actors. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough indepth coverage. Purosinaloense T/K 10:12, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I request the Wikipedian Admins to please look into the Wikipedian Article of the subject Abrar Qazi. Just like the Wikipedian Admins have approved the article Abrar Qazi to be following all the criterion of WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the same way, the article of the subject Priyanka Choudhary too has fulfilled all the criterion necessary for WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content. ——Serial 09:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Plus as Sonofstar has wrongly claimed, this article falls nowhere into WP:TOOSOON. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] Therefore, I put down my opinion to keep this article. --Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Only one major acting role and lacks in-depth coverage on the subject. TOOSOON. Fails NACTOR. Sunshine1191 (talk) 11:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content. ——Serial 09:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

@Sunshine1191- No you are wrong. The subject infact has THREE MAJOR ACTING ROLES; which are in Yeh Hai Chahatein (where the subject was playing PARALLEL LEAD till her character was killed); then the lead in an episode of Savdhaan India and at present one of the leads in Udaariyaan. --] (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, that very well proves that the subject has fulfilled WP:NACTOR.--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, the wikipedia article of the subject has ENOUGH IN-DEPTH COVERAGE ON THE SUBJECT which user Sonofstar had tried to remove for some INVALID, IMMORAL, VAGUE REASONS.--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lastly, the subject can nowhere be counted as TOOSOON because apart from being part of television shows. The subject has been also part of several musical video projects of the reliable sources are from verified youtube channels. So, that provides for the subject not being TOOSOON and also fulfilling GNG. Thanks --Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NACTOR, and a BEFORE indicates a lack of WP:N based on a dearth of WP:RS. ——Serial 09:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- Would just like to state that despite Aleyamma38's repeated attempt at flooding the discussion with the same tedious points and redundant arguments like other stuff exists, in order to sway opinions, I will be sticking with my previously stated opinion that the said article should be Deleted. Sunshine1191 (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dearth of reliable independent sourcing that's actually about the subject. Guy (help! - typo?) 18:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.