Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Singh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I see consensus that the subject may become notable in future, but the coverage is not there to establish notability at this time. GirthSummit (blether) 15:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priya Singh[edit]

Priya Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is a long way from meeting WP:GNG, and her two leading roles in (likely) notable films thus far are a bit shy of the multiple requirement specified in WP:NACTOR. I think that this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. signed, Rosguill talk 21:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 21:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 21:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete Weak Keep or Draftify: Putting aside the fact that most of the coverage on the subject—and there is quite a bit of it—comes from sources of questionable reliability (Times of India and International Business Times), my greater concern is the notability of the films in which she has starred. I read "multiple" to mean "more than one", so I think she has had multiple significant roles—but the films themselves are only moderately notable, in my opinion, and one of them hasn't been released yet, it seems. If the subject's filmography were greater, I would be more inclined to overlook this; but, as it is, I am not sure that WP:NACTOR is met. I agree with the nominator that the page was created prematurely; however, I don't think outright deletion need be the only option here, and would suggest "draftifying" the article, because the subject may meet the notability criteria in the near future. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: Given the argument that the films may be notable, I am upgrading my vote; however, I still believe that "draftifying" would be appropriate if the consensus is to delete. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 02:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 05:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.