Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Richard Arnold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Corkbush Field mutiny. Tone 11:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Private Richard Arnold[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:MILMOS/N Anotherclown (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Anotherclown (talk) 10:23, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Corkbush Field mutiny - Arnold seems to have been the only soldier shot for participation in this mutiny, so while I agree that he's not notable in isolation, his name is a potential search term. Nick-D (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Corkbush Field mutiny. I agree with Nick, this is a plausible search term, and should be useful to readers as a redirect.--resident (talk) 10:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: per Nick-D, a redirect here makes sense. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Corkbush Field mutiny as per Nick-D. Edward321 (talk) 23:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.