Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Retirement Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 20:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Private Retirement Trust[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

About a non-notable proprietary retirement funding vehicle, the Private Retirement TrustSM, or PRTSM. No coverage to meet WP:GNG. Largoplazo (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim of notability. The article is merely regurgitation of state-level statutes. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or stubify. It's possible (even likely) that a good encyclopedia article could be written on this topic, but this isn't it, per Power~enwiki. Maybe just WP:TNT and turn it into a stub, but deleting it isn't a bad alternative. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.