Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prisoners of Society
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Prisoners of Society[edit]
- Prisoners of Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Movie in pre-production with no assertion of notability. Also, the article on the production house is currently nominated for speedy deletion has been speedied. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete supposedly upcoming movie not on IMDB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Nathan Phillips without prejudice toward recreation as seperate article when film can meet WP:NF. There's some available now telling us that this will be Nathan Phillips directorial debut and that the the comedy is expected to begin shooting next year.[1][2] Wikipedia can wait for more. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // ark // 00:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unnotable film that fails WP:NFF and WP:N. I do not understand the suggestion to redirect it to a disambig page given above. The director is also unnotable, so nothing to redirect to. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.