Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pringles (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pringles (game)[edit]

Non-notable game. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. That goes for the beach as well [1]. Hús ö nd 04:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This game is a very popular game in that part of the world. Wikipedia is a global enyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pringles123456789 (talk • contribs)

Then you can provide some independent sources to verify that? BTW, Delete Danny Lilithborne 04:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'd prodded it for the same reasons as nom. --Jamoche 06:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity article. SkipSmith 08:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as blatant vanity. As if we should know, or care, who this "Joel" person is. JIP | Talk 08:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up on a sunny day at Sandy Bay Paradise... --Roninbk _{t c #} 08:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It should be noted after a quick trip through the diffs that Mr Pringles removed a prod without comment [2] --Roninbk _{t c #} 10:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 09:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent edits were not made by me. At the moment, this page is in order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pringles123456789 (talk • contribs)

Indeed, they seem to have been made by Jbabcock (talk · contribs), whose only contributions are to that article. This seems to be a single purpose account used only to vandalise the Pringles (game) article. JIP | Talk 10:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. —Wrathchild ^(talk) 12:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Resolute 04:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If it's that popular, reliable sources must have written about it. ColourBurst 17:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 05:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.