Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Sofía, Duchess of Calabria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any redirect to Prince Pedro, Duke of Calabria is a matter for editors. Sandstein 12:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Sofía, Duchess of Calabria[edit]

Princess Sofía, Duchess of Calabria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication of notability. Virtually all online coverage of the subject comes from genealogy websites, and indeed Wikipedia's article about her amounts to nothing more than a genealogical entry. Since the subject utterly fails WP:GNG, I do not think Wikipedia should cover her. Surtsicna (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether she is the consort to the head of the house is disputed but in any case, her relationship to a notable individual cannot confer notability on her. See WP:INVALIDBIO. I cannot find the coverage necessary to establish her notability per WP:GNG. Can you? Surtsicna (talk) 18:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.Smeat75 (talk) 18:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The bulk of her article space is taken up listing the full names and birthdates of her numerous children (most of them minors). If people outside of the narrow demographic that follows formerly royal houses cared about her, there would be sources. JoelleJay (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to husband PamD 08:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete being the consort to someone whose family was deposed from power decades ago is not a default sign of notability and the sourcing is not there to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per WP:OUTCOMES. A run of the mill heiress, she married well and became a stay-at-home mother of seven. There's a bit of coverage of her on social pages and social media, but it's not significant coverage; just rather passing mentions on wedding guest lists and in obituaries. We have in the past redirected the consorts of nobility. Bearian (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.