Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Ortrud of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Ortrud of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg[edit]

Princess Ortrud of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a purely genealogical entry, yet Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. She was a princess only to those who chose to call her that and the general public had no idea that she existed. She lived a private life as a private citizen and an encyclopedia has no business covering her. Surtsicna (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete She was not really a princess or a duchess since she was born after Germany became a republic, and some decades after the Kingdom of Hanover was annnexed by Prussia. PatGallacher (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and the other comment above. Smeat75 (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a genealogical dictionary even for royal families that held power, this applies even more to royal families deposed before the subject of coverage was born.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Yet another article sourced entirely to genealogy books. JoelleJay (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 10:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and the other comment above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.