Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Laura of Belgium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Princess Astrid of Belgium#Marriage and issue. There is consensus to not keep the article. However, redirects are cheap and may be created in the normal course of editing so I will go with delete and redirect. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Maria Laura of Belgium[edit]

Princess Maria Laura of Belgium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A vast majority of people in Belgium would shrug if asked about a "Maria Laura". She is one of the five children of the sister of the Belgian king. Despite having been granted the title of princess as a child, Maria Laura was raised without expectation of any public role and has never been of much interest to reputable media outlets. Even in Belgian tabloids, she is featured less than the ex-girlfriends of the British Prince Harry. Google search results come almost exclusively from blogs, forums, and image hosting websites. All in all, the subject is a private person of no apparent notability. Surtsicna (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to her mother, Princess Astrid of Belgium. This article is pretty much devoid of sources, as neither of the two linked pages actually finds anything, much less anything biographically significant. If she receives more significant coverage in the future, the article can be re-created later. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete being a member of a royal family is not in and of itself a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.Smeat75 (talk) 19:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Princess Astrid of Belgium#Marriage and issue or delete unless sources confirming independent notability surface. TJMSmith (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect to mother's article, unless/until it too is deleted. No independent notability, but worth a redirect (plus redirects from other names). PamD 09:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect, everything about her can fit in her mother's article. JoelleJay (talk) 18:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 02:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.