Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Kalina of Bulgaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Simeon Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. There is a split between keep and delete, but I will go with a redirect to her father, where all the sourced information are already included (she was born, got married, had children). Other things are not sourced. Tone 10:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Kalina of Bulgaria[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is merely a genealogical entry. While her husband and father are notable individuals, I do not see significant coverage of her in reliable sources. I am having difficulty finding out what she even does in her life; all I come across are genealogy websites. If I am missing significant coverage, please point it out. Surtsicna (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete , no indication of notability. Smeat75 (talk) 16:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Devokewater @ 09:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Hello Magazine, People, Telegraph, Europost seems like significant coverage to me. Not to mention she is included on the Royal Family's Official Website. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, those are just birth announcements. The official website is not independent of the subject. The Telegraph article, something I would normally consider a very reputable source, gives her a "Disney score: 7/10" and sums her up as "more ballsy than a beauty". I just cannot see how something like that could point to a person's encyclopedic significance. Surtsicna (talk) 23:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Willthacheerleader18 --Richiepip (talk) 00:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not convinced the tabloid articles demonstrate encyclopedic notability. They're just blurbs (the People one is barely a paragraph and was written by "peoplestaff225") with little to indicate she attracts coverage by herself. JoelleJay (talk) 07:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV - in the 20th and 21st century, getting into tabloids is what they do; per my standards for nobility. Bearian (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid mirror. Members of deposed royal houses are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Passes WP:GNG and a cursory Google News result reveals additional sources [1] [2]. W 42 16:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- satisfies GNG Thepilipalasgirl (talk) 23:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep As said above, there is enough to meet WP:GNG. Cape Diamond MM (talk) 09:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:GNG applies. Sources looks good.BabbaQ (talk) 10:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just pro forma information about member of deposed royal family. PatGallacher (talk) 00:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Willthacheerleader18 -- Oleryhlolsson (talk) 08:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very little non-genealogical information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.110.217.186 (talk) 00:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ - actual royalty, significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian, how is she "actual royalty"? Bulgaria has been a republic since before she was born. Surtsicna (talk) 22:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She didn't marry into royalty. Bearian (talk) 23:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She was not really born into it either. Surtsicna (talk) 08:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: You have !voted twice. Would you like to strike one of your !votes? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.