Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Elisabetta of Belgium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Elisabetta of Belgium[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created due to the subject's marriage with one of the nephews of the Belgian king. The subject attracts virtually no press coverage and apparently does not even bear the title princess of Belgium. Unless there is some coverage in reliable sources that I am missing, I do not think this topic passes WP:BASIC notability criteria. Surtsicna (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Vanity Fair story cited three times doesn't even mention her actual name--just a brief mention of "Ettore's daughter Lili". The other citations are to Twitter and Facebook, which clearly aren't reliable, and to a few newspaper lifestyle sections that have a paragraph on the couple. Clearly not notable outside of her marriage and her extended family. JoelleJay (talk) 06:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - she has a career, which is more than most royals. Bearian (talk) 14:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian, can it be demonstrated that she is notable for that career? In other words, is there enough coverage in reliable sources to establish that she is notable as a journalist? Currently the article sums up her career in a single sentence. Surtsicna (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete her career is clearly not notable, she is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable --Devokewater@ 12:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.