Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Caroline Napoléon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Caroline Napoléon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is someone's daughter, stepdaughter, sister, half-sister, wife, and mother. She is the daughter of someone who claims a non-existent throne but cannot claim it herself. Alright. Where is the notability? I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources pointing to notability. Surtsicna (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No indication of notability. Smeat75 (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being listed in a royal genealogy book does not make one notable. JoelleJay (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be a genealogical database for long deposed royal houses. As in this house was out of power 110 years before her birth, and she is now 40. It will have been out of power for more than twice the length of her life unless she lives to be over 110.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No indication of independent notability, and far removed from distinguished ancestors. --GRuban (talk) 13:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV and my standards. She's a princess who's tried very hard to avoid any hint of a scandal. I've found some evidence online that she's been involved in charitable work, and she gets passing mentions every few years for attending some royal wedding, but she's not a big socialite. Bearian (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.